H.R. 9497

Water Resources Development Act of 2026

Sponsor: Sam Graves

3 cosponsors
Follow this bill

Official summary

Written by the Congressional Research Service.

Water Resources Development Act of 2026

This bill authorizes and modifies certain water resource infrastructure projects and programs of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and makes related requirements. For example, the bill authorizes and modifies various water resources feasibility studies and projects of the Corps of Engineers, such as studies or projects to

  • maintain ports and harbors,
  • make certain waterways more navigable,
  • reduce flood and storm damage,
  • restore aquatic ecosystems and protect fish and wildlife,
  • protect shorelines,
  • address harmful algal blooms,
  • rehabilitate dams,
  • manage recreational sites and facilities,
  • support water supply and storage projects, and
  • support other water resources infrastructure.

The bill also directs the Corps of Engineers to establish an Office on Alternative Delivery Methods in order to accelerate project delivery of infrastructure. 

In addition, the bill directs the Corps of Engineers to issue a rule that establishes categorical permissions for certain harbor or river improvements that will cause only minimal adverse environmental effects.

Text of the bill

Expand all
Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents Changed · Sep 16

Where this section came from

  1. Jun 29, 2026 · Introduced in House Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Jun 29
  2. Sep 3, 2026 · Reported in House Marked up by House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Jul 14 Reported by House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Sep 3 Committee members' individual votes aren't in our records.
  3. Sep 16, 2026 · Engrossed in House On Motion to Suspend the Rules and Pass, as Amended — Passed, 415–9 · Roll Call 313
What changed in the text

(a) Short title. This Act may be cited as the Water Resources Development Act of 2026.

(b) Table of contents. The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents.Sec. 2. Secretary defined.Title I—General ProvisionsSec. 101. Program Offices within the Directorate of Civil Works.Sec. 102. Contracting efficiency.Sec. 103. Removal or remediation of contaminated sediment.Sec. 104. Levee owners board.Sec. 105. Categorical permissions.Sec. 106. Contributions by non-Federal interests.Sec. 107. Electronic submission and tracking of permit applications.Sec. 108. Project study schedule and cost estimate.Sec. 109. Continuing authority programs.Sec. 110. Dredged material management plans.Sec. 111. Dredging coordination.Sec. 112. Federal standard for dredged material disposal or placement.Sec. 113. Allocations from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund.Sec. 114. Soo Locks operator wage rates.Sec. 115. Beneficial use of dredged material from harbors in the State of Ohio.Sec. 116. Minimum real estate interest.Sec. 117. Real estate appraisal validity.Sec. 118. Watershed and river basin assessments.Sec. 119. Prohibition on diversion of water from Missouri River.Sec. 120. Law enforcement at water resources development projects.Sec. 121. Disaster debris removal.Sec. 122. Wildfire contingency strategies.Sec. 123. Reservoir sediment pilot program.Sec. 124. Environmental dredging.Sec. 125. Expenses for control of aquatic plant growths and invasive species.Sec. 126. Feasibility studies; review of shoreline and streambank protection.Sec. 127. Harmful algal bloom demonstration program.Sec. 128. Shoreline and riverine protection and restoration.Sec. 129. Fish and oyster habitat restoration.Sec. 130. Benefits and costs attributable to certain measures.Sec. 131. Policy on utilization of all Corps authorities and missions.Sec. 132. Comprehensive feasibility studies and approaches for flood risk management and coastal storm risk management.Sec. 133. Realignment of certain Corps of Engineers Districts.Sec. 134. Update of Corps policy.Sec. 135. Availability of project information.Sec. 136. Fish and wildlife mitigation.Sec. 137. Sense of Congress regarding evaluation of flood risk management projects.Sec. 138. Recreational access.Sec. 139. Sense of Congress on munitions disposal.Sec. 140. Corps of Engineers workforce.Sec. 141. Reporting and oversight.Sec. 142. Ability to pay.Sec. 143. Pilot program prioritization.Sec. 144. Vessel removal by Corps of Engineers.Sec. 145. Sense of Congress related to Everglades Agricultural Area project.Title II—Studies and ReportsSec. 201. Authorization of proposed feasibility studies.Sec. 202. Expedited completion.Sec. 203. Expedited modification of existing feasibility studies.Sec. 204. Expedited completion of other feasibility studies.Sec. 205. Corps of Engineers reports.Sec. 206. Report on the inland waterways system.Sec. 207. Coastal Storm Risk Management Trust Fund study.Sec. 208. Assessment of emerging harbor maintenance backlog.Sec. 209. GAO studies.Sec. 210. Inspector General reports.Sec. 211. Acceleration of emergency inland navigation projects.Sec. 212. Assessment of commercial fish landings data.Sec. 213. Assessments of dryland stream technologies and shoreline stabilization technologies.Sec. 214. Assessment of nonstructural approaches to flood risk management and hurricane and storm risk reduction.Sec. 215. Post-disaster watershed assessment for impacted areas.Sec. 216. Updated plan on Federal hopper dredge recapitalization.Sec. 217. Choctawhatchee and Pea River basins, Alabama and Florida.Sec. 218. Mobile Harbor land use assessment.Sec. 219. Expedited After-Action Review of Lake Okeechobee Recovery Operations.Sec. 220. Honolulu Harbor, Hawaii.Sec. 221. Chicago Area Waterway System.Sec. 222. Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin project, Brandon Road, Will County, Illinois.Sec. 223. Columbia Lock and Dam, Louisiana.Sec. 224. Lower Mississippi River Comprehensive Management Study.Sec. 225. Disposition study for Cape Cod Canal, Massachusetts.Sec. 226. New England regional confined aquatic disposal facilities.Sec. 227. Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia.Sec. 228. Big Sandy Lake, Minnesota.Sec. 229. Upper Missouri River Basin sedimentation.Sec. 230. Table Rock Lake disposition study, Missouri and Arkansas.Sec. 231. Table Rock Lake, Missouri and Arkansas.Sec. 232. Evaluation of atomic contamination at Cochiti Lake, Sandoval County, New Mexico.Sec. 233. National Academy of Sciences study on Upper Rio Grande Basin.Sec. 234. Arbuckle-Timbered Hills, Oklahoma.Sec. 235. Disposition and cost allocation study of Willamette Valley, Oregon.Sec. 236. Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoir and Dam, Pennsylvania.Sec. 237. Humphreys County, Tennessee.Sec. 238. Sam Rayburn Reservoir, Texas.Sec. 239. Columbia River, Washington.Sec. 240. Tri-Cities Area, Washington.Title III—Deauthorizations and ModificationsSec. 301. Deauthorization of inactive projects.Sec. 302. General reauthorizations.Sec. 303. Conveyances.Sec. 304. Land exchange, Walton and Bay Counties, Florida.Sec. 305. Port Canaveral, Florida.Sec. 306. Specific deauthorizations.Sec. 307. Environmental infrastructure.Sec. 308. Forecast-informed reservoir operations.Sec. 309. Floodplain management services.Sec. 310. Planning assistance to States.Sec. 311. Maintenance of navigation channels.Sec. 312. Mobile Harbor, Alabama.Sec. 313. Mendenhall Glacier outburst flooding, Alaska.Sec. 314. Hansen Dam, Los Angeles–San Gabriel River Basin, California.Sec. 315. Morro Bay, California.Sec. 316. Oceanside, California.Sec. 317. Pajaro River, California.Sec. 318. Rio Grande Environmental Management Program, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas.Sec. 319. Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida.Sec. 320. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Louisiana.Sec. 321. Pilottown anchorage area, Louisiana.Sec. 322. Jack Hubbard Memorial Breakwater, Burt Township, Michigan.Sec. 323. Sardis Lake, Panola County, Mississippi.Sec. 324. Hydraulic evaluation of Upper Mississippi River.Sec. 325. Lower Missouri River comprehensive flood protection.Sec. 326. Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee.Sec. 327. Great Lakes Commission.Sec. 328. Great Lakes Fishery and ecosystem restoration.Sec. 329. Truckee River and tributaries, Nevada.Sec. 330. Cooperative agreements, New Mexico.Sec. 331. Kinzua Dam safety modification study, Allegheny River, New York and Pennsylvania.Sec. 332. Surf City and North Topsail Beach, North Carolina.Sec. 333. Massillon Local Protection Project, Tuscarawas River, Ohio.Sec. 334. Toussaint River Federal navigation project, Carroll Township, Ohio.Sec. 335. Rio Puerto Nuevo flood risk management project, San Juan, Puerto Rico.Sec. 336. Buffalo Bayou Tributaries and Resiliency Study, Texas.Sec. 337. Chambers, Galveston, and Harris Counties, Texas, expedited real estate transfers.Sec. 338. Coastal Virginia.Sec. 339. Norfolk Coastal Storm Risk Management, Virginia.Sec. 340. Puget Sound and adjacent waters restoration, Washington.Sec. 341. Lower Columbia River.Sec. 342. Lower Columbia River Basin ecosystem restoration assessment.Sec. 343. Puget Sound nearshore ecosystem restoration, Washington.Sec. 344. Washington Metropolitan Area, Washington, District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia.Sec. 345. Federal Triangle Area, Washington, District of Columbia.Title IV—Water Resources InfrastructureSec. 401. Project authorizations.Sec. 402. Expedited completion of projects and activities.Title V—Dam SafetySec. 501. National Dam Safety Program amendments.Sec. 502. Study on high hazard potential dam prioritizations.

(b) Table of contents. The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Secretary defined. Title I—General Provisions Sec. 101. Program Offices within the Directorate of Civil Works. Sec. 102. Contracting efficiency. Sec. 103. Removal or remediation of contaminated sediment. Sec. 104. Levee owners board. Sec. 105. Categorical permissions. Sec. 106. Contributions by non-Federal interests. Sec. 107. Electronic submission and tracking of permit applications. Sec. 108. Project study schedule and cost estimate. Sec. 109. Continuing authority programs. Sec. 110. Dredged material management plans. Sec. 111. Dredging coordination. Sec. 112. Federal standard for dredged material disposal or placement. Sec. 113. Allocations from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund. Sec. 114. Soo Locks operator wage rates. Sec. 115. Beneficial use of dredged material from harbors in the State of Ohio. Sec. 116. Minimum real estate interest. Sec. 117. Real estate appraisal validity. Sec. 118. Watershed and river basin assessments. Sec. 119. Prohibition on diversion of water from Missouri River. Sec. 120. Law enforcement at water resources development projects. Sec. 121. Disaster debris removal. Sec. 122. Wildfire contingency strategies. Sec. 123. Reservoir sediment pilot program. Sec. 124. Environmental dredging. Sec. 125. Expenses for control of aquatic plant growths and invasive species. Sec. 126. Feasibility studies; review of shoreline and streambank protection. Sec. 127. Harmful algal bloom demonstration program. Sec. 128. Shoreline and riverine protection and restoration. Sec. 129. Fish and oyster habitat restoration. Sec. 130. Benefits and costs attributable to certain measures. Sec. 131. Policy on utilization of all Corps authorities and missions. Sec. 132. Comprehensive feasibility studies and approaches for flood risk management and coastal storm risk management. Sec. 133. Realignment of certain Corps of Engineers Districts. Sec. 134. Update of Corps policy. Sec. 135. Availability of project information. Sec. 136. Fish and wildlife mitigation. Sec. 137. Sense of Congress regarding evaluation of flood risk management projects. Sec. 138. Recreational access. Sec. 139. Sense of Congress on munitions disposal. Sec. 140. Corps of Engineers workforce. Sec. 141. Reporting and oversight. Sec. 142. Ability to pay. Sec. 143. Pilot program prioritization. Sec. 144. Vessel removal by Corps of Engineers. Sec. 145. Sense of Congress related to Everglades Agricultural Area project. Title II—Studies and Reports Sec. 201. Authorization of proposed feasibility studies. Sec. 202. Expedited completion. Sec. 203. Expedited modification of existing feasibility studies. Sec. 204. Expedited completion of other feasibility studies. Sec. 205. Corps of Engineers reports. Sec. 206. Report on the inland waterways system. Sec. 207. Coastal Storm Risk Management Trust Fund study. Sec. 208. Assessment of emerging harbor maintenance backlog. Sec. 209. GAO studies. Sec. 210. Inspector General reports. Sec. 211. Acceleration of emergency inland navigation projects. Sec. 212. Assessment of commercial fish landings data. Sec. 213. Assessments of dryland stream technologies and shoreline stabilization technologies. Sec. 214. Assessment of nonstructural approaches to flood risk management and hurricane and storm risk reduction. Sec. 215. Post-disaster watershed assessment for impacted areas. Sec. 216. Updated plan on Federal hopper dredge recapitalization. Sec. 217. Choctawhatchee and Pea River basins, Alabama and Florida. Sec. 218. Mobile Harbor land use assessment. Sec. 219. Expedited After-Action Review of Lake Okeechobee Recovery Operations. Sec. 220. Honolulu Harbor, Hawaii. Sec. 221. Chicago Area Waterway System. Sec. 222. Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin project, Brandon Road, Will County, Illinois. Sec. 223. Columbia Lock and Dam, Louisiana. Sec. 224. Lower Mississippi River Comprehensive Management Study. Sec. 225. Disposition study for Cape Cod Canal, Massachusetts. Sec. 226. New England regional confined aquatic disposal facilities. Sec. 227. Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia. Sec. 228. Big Sandy Lake, Minnesota. Sec. 229. Upper Missouri River Basin sedimentation. Sec. 230. Table Rock Lake disposition study, Missouri and Arkansas. Sec. 231. Table Rock Lake, Missouri and Arkansas. Sec. 232. Evaluation of atomic contamination at Cochiti Lake, Sandoval County, New Mexico. Sec. 233. National Academy of Sciences study on Upper Rio Grande Basin. Sec. 234. Arbuckle-Timbered Hills, Oklahoma. Sec. 235. Disposition and cost allocation study of Willamette Valley, Oregon. Sec. 236. Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoir and Dam, Pennsylvania. Sec. 237. Humphreys County, Tennessee. Sec. 238. Sam Rayburn Reservoir, Texas. Sec. 239. Columbia River, Washington. Sec. 240. Tri-Cities Area, Washington. Title III—Deauthorizations and Modifications Sec. 301. Deauthorization of inactive projects. Sec. 302. General reauthorizations. Sec. 303. Conveyances. Sec. 304. Land exchange, Walton and Bay Counties, Florida. Sec. 305. Port Canaveral, Florida. Sec. 306. Specific deauthorizations. Sec. 307. Environmental infrastructure. Sec. 308. Forecast-informed reservoir operations. Sec. 309. Floodplain management services. Sec. 310. Planning assistance to States. Sec. 311. Maintenance of navigation channels. Sec. 312. Mobile Harbor, Alabama. Sec. 313. Mendenhall Glacier outburst flooding, Alaska. Sec. 314. Hansen Dam, Los Angeles–San Gabriel River Basin, California. Sec. 315. Morro Bay, California. Sec. 316. Oceanside, California. Sec. 317. Pajaro River, California. Sec. 318. Arkansas Valley Conduit, Colorado. Sec. 319. Rio Grande Environmental Management Program, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. Sec. 320. Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida. Sec. 321. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Louisiana. Sec. 322. Pilottown anchorage area, Louisiana. Sec. 323. Jack Hubbard Memorial Breakwater, Burt Township, Michigan. Sec. 324. Sardis Lake, Panola County, Mississippi. Sec. 325. Hydraulic evaluation of Upper Mississippi River. Sec. 326. Lower Missouri River comprehensive flood protection. Sec. 327. Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee. Sec. 328. Great Lakes Commission. Sec. 329. Great Lakes Fishery and ecosystem restoration. Sec. 330. Truckee River and tributaries, Nevada. Sec. 331. Cooperative agreements, New Mexico. Sec. 332. Kinzua Dam safety modification study, Allegheny River, New York and Pennsylvania. Sec. 333. Surf City and North Topsail Beach, North Carolina. Sec. 334. Massillon Local Protection Project, Tuscarawas River, Ohio. Sec. 335. Toussaint River Federal navigation project, Carroll Township, Ohio. Sec. 336. Rio Puerto Nuevo flood risk management project, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Sec. 337. Buffalo Bayou Tributaries and Resiliency Study, Texas. Sec. 338. Chambers, Galveston, and Harris Counties, Texas, expedited real estate transfers. Sec. 339. Coastal Virginia. Sec. 340. Norfolk Coastal Storm Risk Management, Virginia. Sec. 341. Puget Sound and adjacent waters restoration, Washington. Sec. 342. Lower Columbia River. Sec. 343. Lower Columbia River Basin ecosystem restoration assessment. Sec. 344. Puget Sound nearshore ecosystem restoration, Washington. Sec. 345. Washington Metropolitan Area, Washington, District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. Sec. 346. Federal Triangle Area, Washington, District of Columbia. Title IV—Water Resources Infrastructure Sec. 401. Project authorizations. Sec. 402. Expedited completion of projects and activities. Title V—Dam Safety Sec. 501. National Dam Safety Program amendments. Sec. 502. Study on high hazard potential dam prioritizations.

What is a markup?

A markup is a committee meeting where members go through a bill and vote on changes before sending it to the full chamber.

(a) Short title. This Act may be cited as the Water Resources Development Act of 2026.

(b) Table of contents. The table of contents for this Act is as follows: Sec. 1. Short title; table of contents. Sec. 2. Secretary defined. Title I—General Provisions Sec. 101. Program Offices within the Directorate of Civil Works. Sec. 102. Contracting efficiency. Sec. 103. Removal or remediation of contaminated sediment. Sec. 104. Levee owners board. Sec. 105. Categorical permissions. Sec. 106. Contributions by non-Federal interests. Sec. 107. Electronic submission and tracking of permit applications. Sec. 108. Project study schedule and cost estimate. Sec. 109. Continuing authority programs. Sec. 110. Dredged material management plans. Sec. 111. Dredging coordination. Sec. 112. Federal standard for dredged material disposal or placement. Sec. 113. Allocations from the Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund. Sec. 114. Soo Locks operator wage rates. Sec. 115. Beneficial use of dredged material from harbors in the State of Ohio. Sec. 116. Minimum real estate interest. Sec. 117. Real estate appraisal validity. Sec. 118. Watershed and river basin assessments. Sec. 119. Prohibition on diversion of water from Missouri River. Sec. 120. Law enforcement at water resources development projects. Sec. 121. Disaster debris removal. Sec. 122. Wildfire contingency strategies. Sec. 123. Reservoir sediment pilot program. Sec. 124. Environmental dredging. Sec. 125. Expenses for control of aquatic plant growths and invasive species. Sec. 126. Feasibility studies; review of shoreline and streambank protection. Sec. 127. Harmful algal bloom demonstration program. Sec. 128. Shoreline and riverine protection and restoration. Sec. 129. Fish and oyster habitat restoration. Sec. 130. Benefits and costs attributable to certain measures. Sec. 131. Policy on utilization of all Corps authorities and missions. Sec. 132. Comprehensive feasibility studies and approaches for flood risk management and coastal storm risk management. Sec. 133. Realignment of certain Corps of Engineers Districts. Sec. 134. Update of Corps policy. Sec. 135. Availability of project information. Sec. 136. Fish and wildlife mitigation. Sec. 137. Sense of Congress regarding evaluation of flood risk management projects. Sec. 138. Recreational access. Sec. 139. Sense of Congress on munitions disposal. Sec. 140. Corps of Engineers workforce. Sec. 141. Reporting and oversight. Sec. 142. Ability to pay. Sec. 143. Pilot program prioritization. Sec. 144. Vessel removal by Corps of Engineers. Sec. 145. Sense of Congress related to Everglades Agricultural Area project. Title II—Studies and Reports Sec. 201. Authorization of proposed feasibility studies. Sec. 202. Expedited completion. Sec. 203. Expedited modification of existing feasibility studies. Sec. 204. Expedited completion of other feasibility studies. Sec. 205. Corps of Engineers reports. Sec. 206. Report on the inland waterways system. Sec. 207. Coastal Storm Risk Management Trust Fund study. Sec. 208. Assessment of emerging harbor maintenance backlog. Sec. 209. GAO studies. Sec. 210. Inspector General reports. Sec. 211. Acceleration of emergency inland navigation projects. Sec. 212. Assessment of commercial fish landings data. Sec. 213. Assessments of dryland stream technologies and shoreline stabilization technologies. Sec. 214. Assessment of nonstructural approaches to flood risk management and hurricane and storm risk reduction. Sec. 215. Post-disaster watershed assessment for impacted areas. Sec. 216. Updated plan on Federal hopper dredge recapitalization. Sec. 217. Choctawhatchee and Pea River basins, Alabama and Florida. Sec. 218. Mobile Harbor land use assessment. Sec. 219. Expedited After-Action Review of Lake Okeechobee Recovery Operations. Sec. 220. Honolulu Harbor, Hawaii. Sec. 221. Chicago Area Waterway System. Sec. 222. Great Lakes and Mississippi River Interbasin project, Brandon Road, Will County, Illinois. Sec. 223. Columbia Lock and Dam, Louisiana. Sec. 224. Lower Mississippi River Comprehensive Management Study. Sec. 225. Disposition study for Cape Cod Canal, Massachusetts. Sec. 226. New England regional confined aquatic disposal facilities. Sec. 227. Assateague Island, Maryland and Virginia. Sec. 228. Big Sandy Lake, Minnesota. Sec. 229. Upper Missouri River Basin sedimentation. Sec. 230. Table Rock Lake disposition study, Missouri and Arkansas. Sec. 231. Table Rock Lake, Missouri and Arkansas. Sec. 232. Evaluation of atomic contamination at Cochiti Lake, Sandoval County, New Mexico. Sec. 233. National Academy of Sciences study on Upper Rio Grande Basin. Sec. 234. Arbuckle-Timbered Hills, Oklahoma. Sec. 235. Disposition and cost allocation study of Willamette Valley, Oregon. Sec. 236. Foster Joseph Sayers Reservoir and Dam, Pennsylvania. Sec. 237. Humphreys County, Tennessee. Sec. 238. Sam Rayburn Reservoir, Texas. Sec. 239. Columbia River, Washington. Sec. 240. Tri-Cities Area, Washington. Title III—Deauthorizations and Modifications Sec. 301. Deauthorization of inactive projects. Sec. 302. General reauthorizations. Sec. 303. Conveyances. Sec. 304. Land exchange, Walton and Bay Counties, Florida. Sec. 305. Port Canaveral, Florida. Sec. 306. Specific deauthorizations. Sec. 307. Environmental infrastructure. Sec. 308. Forecast-informed reservoir operations. Sec. 309. Floodplain management services. Sec. 310. Planning assistance to States. Sec. 311. Maintenance of navigation channels. Sec. 312. Mobile Harbor, Alabama. Sec. 313. Mendenhall Glacier outburst flooding, Alaska. Sec. 314. Hansen Dam, Los Angeles–San Gabriel River Basin, California. Sec. 315. Morro Bay, California. Sec. 316. Oceanside, California. Sec. 317. Pajaro River, California. Sec. 318. Arkansas Valley Conduit, Colorado. Sec. 319. Rio Grande Environmental Management Program, Colorado, New Mexico, and Texas. Sec. 320. Miami Harbor, Miami-Dade County, Florida. Sec. 321. Mississippi River-Gulf Outlet, Louisiana. Sec. 322. Pilottown anchorage area, Louisiana. Sec. 323. Jack Hubbard Memorial Breakwater, Burt Township, Michigan. Sec. 324. Sardis Lake, Panola County, Mississippi. Sec. 325. Hydraulic evaluation of Upper Mississippi River. Sec. 326. Lower Missouri River comprehensive flood protection. Sec. 327. Missouri River Recovery Implementation Committee. Sec. 328. Great Lakes Commission. Sec. 329. Great Lakes Fishery and ecosystem restoration. Sec. 330. Truckee River and tributaries, Nevada. Sec. 331. Cooperative agreements, New Mexico. Sec. 332. Kinzua Dam safety modification study, Allegheny River, New York and Pennsylvania. Sec. 333. Surf City and North Topsail Beach, North Carolina. Sec. 334. Massillon Local Protection Project, Tuscarawas River, Ohio. Sec. 335. Toussaint River Federal navigation project, Carroll Township, Ohio. Sec. 336. Rio Puerto Nuevo flood risk management project, San Juan, Puerto Rico. Sec. 337. Buffalo Bayou Tributaries and Resiliency Study, Texas. Sec. 338. Chambers, Galveston, and Harris Counties, Texas, expedited real estate transfers. Sec. 339. Coastal Virginia. Sec. 340. Norfolk Coastal Storm Risk Management, Virginia. Sec. 341. Puget Sound and adjacent waters restoration, Washington. Sec. 342. Lower Columbia River. Sec. 343. Lower Columbia River Basin ecosystem restoration assessment. Sec. 344. Puget Sound nearshore ecosystem restoration, Washington. Sec. 345. Washington Metropolitan Area, Washington, District of Columbia, Maryland, and Virginia. Sec. 346. Federal Triangle Area, Washington, District of Columbia. Title IV—Water Resources Infrastructure Sec. 401. Project authorizations. Sec. 402. Expedited completion of projects and activities. Title V—Dam Safety Sec. 501. National Dam Safety Program amendments. Sec. 502. Study on high hazard potential dam prioritizations.

I General Provisions

II Studies and Reports

III Deauthorizations and Modifications

IV Water Resources Infrastructure

V Dam Safety