H.R. 7613
ALERT Act
Sponsor: Sam Graves
87 cosponsors
- Brad Finstad
- Shri Thanedar
- Sarah McBride
- Jay Obernolte
- Mike Thompson
- Michael Lawler
- Adam Smith
- André Carson
- Austin Scott
- Bonnie Watson Coleman
- Brian Babin
- Bruce Westerman
- Burgess Owens
- Charles J. "Chuck" Fleischmann
- Chrissy Houlahan
- David Rouzer
- Derek Tran
- Donald S. Beyer, Jr.
- Eric A. "Rick" Crawford
- Frederica S. Wilson
- Gilbert Ray Cisneros, Jr.
- Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr.
- Hillary J. Scholten
- Jeff Hurd
- Jefferson Van Drew
- Jennifer A. Kiggans
- Joe Courtney
- Joe Wilson
- John Garamendi
- John W. Rose
- Julia Brownley
- Kimberlyn King-Hinds
- Lance Gooden
- Laura Friedman
- Mark DeSaulnier
- Mike Ezell
- Mike Rogers
- Pete Stauber
- Randy Fine
- Richard McCormick
- Rick Larsen
- Robert J. Wittman
- Sharice Davids
- Shomari Figures
- Suhas Subramanyam
- Tracey Mann
- Troy A. Carter
- Troy E. Nehls
- Valerie P. Foushee
- Vince Fong
- Wesley Bell
- William R. Keating
- William R. Timmons IV
- Daniel Webster
- Don Bacon
- Donald Norcross
- Kristen McDonald Rivet
- Mark Alford
- Scott DesJarlais
- Seth Moulton
- Daniel S. Goldman
- Debbie Wasserman Schultz
- Gabe Evans
- Gus M. Bilirakis
- Jared Huffman
- Jeff Crank
- Jefferson Shreve
- John B. Larson
- Kathy Castor
- Lizzie Fletcher
- Marilyn Strickland
- Mike Bost
- Mike Kennedy
- Nicholas J. Begich III
- Trent Kelly
- Troy Balderson
- Bill Huizenga
- Addison P. McDowell
- Adrian Smith
- Derrick Van Orden
- Elise M. Stefanik
- Frank D. Lucas
- Mark B. Messmer
- Sylvia R. Garcia
- Thomas H. Kean, Jr.
- Brad Knott
- John J. McGuire III
Official summary
Written by the Congressional Research Service.
Airspace Location and Enhanced Risk Transparency Act of 2026 or the ALERT Act
This bill addresses aviation safety by increasing requirements for aircraft tracking and communication using Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) technology and expanding oversight. As background, ADS-B for broadcasting (Out) and receiving (In) transmits information (e.g., location and weather) among aircraft and air traffic control (ATC).
The bill requires the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) to enter into an agreement regarding the use of collision prevention technologies on DOD aircraft. The agreement must require the use of ADS-B Out as the default practice for DOD helicopters operating in the national airspace, unless such use would affect operational security. For DOD helicopters that are carrying out special missions in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area and are exempt from ADS-B Out transmission requirements, DOD must coordinate with DOT to conduct a safety risk assessment and implement appropriate mitigations.
By December 31, 2031, DOD aircraft (other than certain special mission aircraft) must be equipped with and operating integrated ADS-B In technology.
With respect to civil aircraft, by December 31, 2031, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must generally require aircraft that are currently required to be equipped with ADS-B Out to also be equipped with ADS-B In.
Additionally, among other requirements, the FAA must
- establish time-on-position limits for supervisory ATC personnel;
- establish a process to timely notify parties involved in certain near-miss incidents; and
- evaluate and revise, as necessary, helicopter routes around Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.
Text of the bill
I Civil Aviation Matters
Where this section came from
-
Feb 20, 2026 · Introduced in House Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Feb 20 Referred to House Committee on Armed Services, Feb 20
-
Apr 9, 2026 · Reported in House Marked up by House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Mar 26 Marked up by House Committee on Armed Services, Mar 26 Reported by House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Apr 9 Reported by House Committee on Armed Services, Apr 9 Committee members' individual votes aren't in our records.
(a) In general. Not later than 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall establish an aviation rulemaking committee (in this section referred to as the Committee) to review and develop findings and recommendations to require
aircraft that are
selected aircraft to be equipped
and operating
with ACAS
-
Xa
that is— (1) integrated and uses both ADS–B In and transponder interrogations, as required under the RTCA minimum operational performance standards for the Airborne Collision Avoidance System (DO–385A, issued June 22, 2023); and (2) is configured to provide visual and audible alerting to the pilot and flight crew
.
… 3 unchanged passages …
(3) air carriers operating under subpart K of part 91 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations;
… 2 unchanged passages …
(6)
air ambulance operators; (7)
transport category aircraft manufacturers; (
7
8
) general aviation aircraft manufactures; (
8
9
) avionics manufacturers; (
9
10
) supplemental type certificate holders; (
10
11
) modification service providers; (
11
12
) exclusive bargaining representatives of air traffic controllers certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code; (
12
13
) the certified bargaining representative of aviation safety inspectors and engineers for the Federal Aviation Administration; (
13
14
) organizations representing certified collective bargaining representatives of airline pilots; (
14
15
) aviation safety experts with specific knowledge of human factors or human factors experts with specific knowledge of aviation safety;
(16) research institutions with relevant aviation safety or human factors subject matter expertise; (17) a representative from the National Transportation Safety Board with subject matter expertise as an observer;
and (
15
18
) any other stakeholders the Administrator determines appropriate. (c) Considerations. In developing the findings and recommendations under subsection (a
)
),
the Committee shall consider— (1) the anticipated
modifications to the minimum operational performance standards of ACAS-Xa that are required by subsection (e)(1)(B); (2) the results of the evaluation under section 101; (3) the anticipated
certification
deadline
timeline
for ACAS
-
Xa
equipment
given the technical complexity and requisite procedures for approval; (
4
2
) the
soonest practicable deadline for equipping newly manufactured selected aircraft; (5) the soonest practicable deadline to retrofit existing selected aircraft with ACAS-Xa that considers— (A) the
feasibility of using the Line Replaceable Units of existing collision avoidance systems in such aircraft; (
B
3
) the feasibility of using existing antennas of existing collisions avoidance systems in such aircraft;
and
(
C
4
) the commercial availability of all necessary components associated with
integrated
ACAS
-
Xa; (
6
5
) actions the Administrator can take to prioritize the certification and installation of
integrated
ACAS
-
Xa; (
7
6
) related
changes that may be required for the operating rules and
training
necessary
for air traffic controllers, pilots, and others;
(7) harmonization of global standards associated with collision avoidance systems;
and (8) any other considerations the Committee
or the Administrator
determines appropriate.
… 1 unchanged passage …
(e) Rulemaking
and modification of minimal operating performance standards
. (1) In general. Not later than 18 months after the submission of the report under subsection (d
) or 32 months after the date of enactment of this Act (whichever is earlier
), the Administrator shall
— (A)
issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to
require
prohibit persons from operating
selected aircraft
to
unless
be
such aircraft are
equipped
and operating
with ACAS
-
Xa
; and
that—
(
B
A
)
modify
is
the
integrated
minimum
and
operational
uses
performance
both
standards
ADS–B
for
In
ACAS-Xa
and transponder interrogations
,
to
as
include—
required
(i)
under
traffic
the
advisory
RTCA
aural
minimum
alerts
operational
to
performance
include
standards
clock
for
position,
the
relative
Airborne
altitude
Collision Avoidance System (DO–385A
,
range
issued
and
June
vertical
22,
tendency;
2023);
and (
ii
B
)
the
provides
integration
visual
of
and
directional
audible
traffic
alerting
symbols
to the pilot and flight crew
. (2) Contents. The notice of proposed rulemaking described in paragraph (1
)(A
) shall include, at a minimum— (A) appropriate guidance for certification of ACAS
-
Xa; (B)
defined
a
standards
deadline,
for
not
the
to
modification
exceed
described
December
in
31,
paragraph
2031,
(1)(B); (C) a deadline
for any newly manufactured selected aircraft to be equipped with ACAS
-
Xa
, based
that
on
reflects
the
various
findings
aircraft
and
types,
recommendations
appropriate
developed
maintenance
pursuant
cycles, and required updates
to
subsection
appropriate
(b)(1);
guidance
and
after certification of ACAS Xa;
(
D
C
) a deadline
, not to exceed December 31, 2031,
for existing selected aircraft to be retrofit with ACAS
-
Xa
that reflects various aircraft types
,
based
appropriate
on
maintenance cycles, and required updates to appropriate guidance after certification of ACAS Xa; (D) if
the
findings
new
and
minimal
recommendations
operating
developed
performance
pursuant
standards
to
promulgated under
subsection (
b)(1).
f) require an upgrade of software, an upgrade of hardware, or additional training, a deadline for selected aircraft to be upgraded, not to exceed December 31, 2033; and (E) a process by which the Administrator may extend the deadlines specified in subparagraphs (B) and (C), not to exceed a period of 2 years, provided that the Administrator provides a report to the appropriate committees of Congress within 14 days of taking such action, with the reasons justifying such action and an assurance that safety will not be compromised by the delay.
… 1 unchanged passage …
(f)
Modification of minimal operating performance standards. Not later than 30 days after the issuance of a final rule under subsection (e), the Administrator shall work with the appropriate standards-setting organization to update the minimal operation standards for ACAS Xa to— (1) if the evaluation conducted pursuant to section 101 determines that inhibit altitudes can be safely decreased, safely decrease the inhibit altitude in accordance with the results of such evaluation; (2) update traffic advisory aural alert standards to include clock position, relative altitude, range, and vertical tendency; and (3) integrate directional traffic symbols into visual displays. (g) Technical assistance. The Administrator shall provide technical assistance for facilitating equipage across the entire fleet of affected aircraft, including, as appropriate, guidance under part 26 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, to provide support for affected aircraft operators in complying with the requirements of this section. (h)
Selected aircraft defined. In this section, the term selected aircraft means aircraft that are required to be equipped with traffic alert and collision avoidance systems as required in
part
sections
121.356
, 135.180, and 91.1045
of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations
, and part 135
.
180 of such title.
What is a markup?
A markup is a committee meeting where members go through a bill and vote on changes before sending it to the full chamber.
(a) In general. Not later than 45 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall establish an aviation rulemaking committee (in this section referred to as the Committee) to review and develop findings and recommendations to require selected aircraft to be equipped and operating with ACAS Xa that is—
(1) integrated and uses both ADS–B In and transponder interrogations, as required under the RTCA minimum operational performance standards for the Airborne Collision Avoidance System (DO–385A, issued June 22, 2023); and
(2) is configured to provide visual and audible alerting to the pilot and flight crew.
(b) Composition. The Committee shall consist of members appointed by the Administrator, including representatives of—
(1) air carriers operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, including regional air carriers and air carriers with a low-cost or ultra-low-cost business model;
(2) air carriers operating under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations;
(3) air carriers operating under subpart K of part 91 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations;
(4) business aviation operators;
(5) cargo air carriers;
(6) air ambulance operators;
(7) transport category aircraft manufacturers;
(8) general aviation aircraft manufactures;
(9) avionics manufacturers;
(10) supplemental type certificate holders;
(11) modification service providers;
(12) exclusive bargaining representatives of air traffic controllers certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code;
(13) the certified bargaining representative of aviation safety inspectors and engineers for the Federal Aviation Administration;
(14) organizations representing certified collective bargaining representatives of airline pilots;
(15) aviation safety experts with specific knowledge of human factors or human factors experts with specific knowledge of aviation safety;
(16) research institutions with relevant aviation safety or human factors subject matter expertise;
(17) a representative from the National Transportation Safety Board with subject matter expertise as an observer; and
(18) any other stakeholders the Administrator determines appropriate.
(c) Considerations. In developing the findings and recommendations under subsection (a), the Committee shall consider—
(1) the anticipated certification timeline for ACAS Xa equipment given the technical complexity and requisite procedures for approval;
(2) the feasibility of using the Line Replaceable Units of existing collision avoidance systems in such aircraft;
(3) the feasibility of using existing antennas of existing collisions avoidance systems in such aircraft;
(4) the commercial availability of all necessary components associated with integrated ACAS Xa;
(5) actions the Administrator can take to prioritize the certification and installation of integrated ACAS Xa;
(6) related changes that may be required for the operating rules and training necessary for air traffic controllers, pilots, and others;
(7) harmonization of global standards associated with collision avoidance systems; and
(8) any other considerations the Committee or the Administrator determines appropriate.
(d) Report. Not later than 1 year after the date of establishment of the Committee, the Committee shall submit to the Administrator and the appropriate committees of Congress a report containing the findings and recommendations of the Committee.
(e) Rulemaking
(1) In general. Not later than 18 months after the submission of the report under subsection (d) or 32 months after the date of enactment of this Act (whichever is earlier), the Administrator shall issue a notice of proposed rulemaking to prohibit persons from operating selected aircraft unless such aircraft are equipped and operating with ACAS Xa that—
(A) is integrated and uses both ADS–B In and transponder interrogations, as required under the RTCA minimum operational performance standards for the Airborne Collision Avoidance System (DO–385A, issued June 22, 2023); and
(B) provides visual and audible alerting to the pilot and flight crew.
(2) Contents. The notice of proposed rulemaking described in paragraph (1) shall include, at a minimum—
(A) appropriate guidance for certification of ACAS Xa;
(B) a deadline, not to exceed December 31, 2031, for any newly manufactured selected aircraft to be equipped with ACAS Xa that reflects various aircraft types, appropriate maintenance cycles, and required updates to appropriate guidance after certification of ACAS Xa;
(C) a deadline, not to exceed December 31, 2031, for existing selected aircraft to be retrofit with ACAS Xa that reflects various aircraft types, appropriate maintenance cycles, and required updates to appropriate guidance after certification of ACAS Xa;
(D) if the new minimal operating performance standards promulgated under subsection (f) require an upgrade of software, an upgrade of hardware, or additional training, a deadline for selected aircraft to be upgraded, not to exceed December 31, 2033; and
(E) a process by which the Administrator may extend the deadlines specified in subparagraphs (B) and (C), not to exceed a period of 2 years, provided that the Administrator provides a report to the appropriate committees of Congress within 14 days of taking such action, with the reasons justifying such action and an assurance that safety will not be compromised by the delay.
(3) Final rule. Not later than 1 year after the issuance of the notice of proposed rulemaking required under paragraph (1)(A), the Administrator shall issue a final rule to carry out the requirements of this section.
(f) Modification of minimal operating performance standards. Not later than 30 days after the issuance of a final rule under subsection (e), the Administrator shall work with the appropriate standards-setting organization to update the minimal operation standards for ACAS Xa to—
(1) if the evaluation conducted pursuant to section 101 determines that inhibit altitudes can be safely decreased, safely decrease the inhibit altitude in accordance with the results of such evaluation;
(2) update traffic advisory aural alert standards to include clock position, relative altitude, range, and vertical tendency; and
(3) integrate directional traffic symbols into visual displays.
(g) Technical assistance. The Administrator shall provide technical assistance for facilitating equipage across the entire fleet of affected aircraft, including, as appropriate, guidance under part 26 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, to provide support for affected aircraft operators in complying with the requirements of this section.
(h) Selected aircraft defined. In this section, the term selected aircraft means aircraft that are required to be equipped with traffic alert and collision avoidance systems as required in sections 121.356, 135.180, and 91.1045 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.
II Department of Defense Matters