H.R. 7613

ALERT Act

Official summary

Written by the Congressional Research Service.

Airspace Location and Enhanced Risk Transparency Act of 2026 or the ALERT Act

This bill addresses aviation safety by increasing requirements for aircraft tracking and communication using Automatic Dependent Surveillance-Broadcast (ADS-B) technology and expanding oversight. As background, ADS-B for broadcasting (Out) and receiving (In) transmits information (e.g., location and weather) among aircraft and air traffic control (ATC).

The bill requires the Department of Defense (DOD) and the Department of Transportation (DOT) to enter into an agreement regarding the use of collision prevention technologies on DOD aircraft. The agreement must require the use of ADS-B Out as the default practice for DOD helicopters operating in the national airspace, unless such use would affect operational security. For DOD helicopters that are carrying out special missions in the Washington, DC, metropolitan area and are exempt from ADS-B Out transmission requirements, DOD must coordinate with DOT to conduct a safety risk assessment and implement appropriate mitigations.

By December 31, 2031, DOD aircraft (other than certain special mission aircraft) must be equipped with and operating integrated ADS-B In technology.

With respect to civil aircraft, by December 31, 2031, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) must generally require aircraft that are currently required to be equipped with ADS-B Out to also be equipped with ADS-B In.

Additionally, among other requirements, the FAA must

  • establish time-on-position limits for supervisory ATC personnel;
  • establish a process to timely notify parties involved in certain near-miss incidents; and
  • evaluate and revise, as necessary, helicopter routes around Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport.

Text of the bill

Expand all

I Civil Aviation Matters

Sec. 101. Airborne Collision Avoidance System Xa inhibit altitude Changed · Apr 9

Where this section came from

  1. Feb 20, 2026 · Introduced in House Referred to House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Feb 20 Referred to House Committee on Armed Services, Feb 20
  2. Apr 9, 2026 · Reported in House Marked up by House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Mar 26 Marked up by House Committee on Armed Services, Mar 26 Reported by House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Apr 9 Reported by House Committee on Armed Services, Apr 9 Committee members' individual votes aren't in our records.
What changed in the text

(a) In general. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall complete an evaluation of the feasibility hazards and safety benefits of decreasing the traffic advisory and resolution advisory inhibit altitudes in Airborne Collision Avoidance System Xa (hereinafter referred to as ACAS - Xa) to enable improved alerting throughout more of the flight maneuvering envelope of an aircraft than is required under the RTCA minimum operational performance standards for the Airborne Collision Avoidance System (DO–385A, issued June 22, 2023).

(b) Consultation. In conducting the evaluation under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consult with representatives of the following:

(1) Air carriers operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations , including regional air carriers and air carriers with a low-cost or ultra-low-cost business model .

… 2 unchanged passages …

(4) Regional Cargo air carriers. (5) Air carriers with a low-cost or ultra-low-cost business model. (6) Cargo air carriers. (7) Transport category aircraft manufacturers. ( 8 6 ) General aviation aircraft manufactures. ( 9 7 ) Avionics manufacturers. ( 10 8 ) Exclusive bargaining representatives of air traffic controllers certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code. ( 11 9 ) Organizations representing certified collective bargaining representatives of airline pilots. ( 12 10 ) The certified bargaining representative of aviation safety inspectors and engineers for the Federal Aviation Administration. ( 13 11 ) Aviation safety experts with specific knowledge of human factors or human factors experts with specific knowledge of aviation safety. (12) Research institutions with relevant aviation safety or human factors subject matter expertise. (13) The National Transportation Safety Board.

(14) Any other stakeholders the Administrator determines appropriate.

(c) Considerations. In conducting the evaluation under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider , at a minimum — (1) safety benefits to the greatest public, extent including possible, reductions human in factors, the including probability products of by midair working and groups near-midair related collisions; (2) the benefits and risks to human the factors ability in of aviation pilots and air traffic controllers to ensure operational safety; ( 2 3 ) air false, traffic misleading, control or procedures potentially during overlapping critical alerts phases or of resolution flight advisories ; ( 3 4 ) technological advances in software logic to limit nuisance or false alerts; (5) air traffic control procedures and the impact to of pilot such procedures on pilots and air traffic controller controllers focus during critical phases of flight; ( 4 6 ) the training benefits requirements and for detriments pilots to pilot and air traffic controller situational awareness controllers ; ( 5 7 ) pilot to training the requirements greatest extent practicable, human factors, including products by working groups related to human factors in aviation safety ; ( 6 8 ) air research traffic and controller simulations training of requirements; reduced and resolution (7) advisory whether inhibit there altitudes is conducted potential by for the overlapping, National conflicting Transportation Safety Board pursuant to Aviation Investigation Report AIR–26–02 adopted on January 27 , 2026; and simultaneous (9) alerts any other considerations the Administrator determines appropriate .

What is a markup?

A markup is a committee meeting where members go through a bill and vote on changes before sending it to the full chamber.

(a) In general. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Administrator shall complete an evaluation of the hazards and safety benefits of decreasing the traffic advisory and resolution advisory inhibit altitudes in Airborne Collision Avoidance System Xa (hereinafter referred to as ACAS Xa) to enable improved alerting throughout more of the flight maneuvering envelope of an aircraft than is required under the RTCA minimum operational performance standards for the Airborne Collision Avoidance System (DO–385A, issued June 22, 2023).

(b) Consultation. In conducting the evaluation under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consult with representatives of the following:

(1) Air carriers operating under part 121 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations, including regional air carriers and air carriers with a low-cost or ultra-low-cost business model.

(2) Air carriers operating under part 135 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

(3) Air carriers operating under part 91 of title 14, Code of Federal Regulations.

(4) Cargo air carriers.

(5) Transport category aircraft manufacturers.

(6) General aviation aircraft manufactures.

(7) Avionics manufacturers.

(8) Exclusive bargaining representatives of air traffic controllers certified under section 7111 of title 5, United States Code.

(9) Organizations representing certified collective bargaining representatives of airline pilots.

(10) The certified bargaining representative of aviation safety inspectors and engineers for the Federal Aviation Administration.

(11) Aviation safety experts with specific knowledge of human factors or human factors experts with specific knowledge of aviation safety.

(12) Research institutions with relevant aviation safety or human factors subject matter expertise.

(13) The National Transportation Safety Board.

(14) Any other stakeholders the Administrator determines appropriate.

(c) Considerations. In conducting the evaluation under subsection (a), the Administrator shall consider, at a minimum—

(1) safety benefits to the public, including reductions in the probability of midair and near-midair collisions;

(2) the benefits and risks to the ability of pilots and air traffic controllers to ensure operational safety;

(3) false, misleading, or potentially overlapping alerts or resolution advisories;

(4) technological advances in software logic to limit nuisance or false alerts;

(5) air traffic control procedures and the impact of such procedures on pilots and air traffic controllers during critical phases of flight;

(6) training requirements for pilots and air traffic controllers;

(7) to the greatest extent practicable, human factors, including products by working groups related to human factors in aviation safety;

(8) research and simulations of reduced resolution advisory inhibit altitudes conducted by the National Transportation Safety Board pursuant to Aviation Investigation Report AIR–26–02 adopted on January 27, 2026; and

(9) any other considerations the Administrator determines appropriate.

II Department of Defense Matters