H.R. 6955

Main Street Capital Access Act

Sponsor: J. French Hill · 33 cosponsors

Follow this bill

Official summary

Written by the Congressional Research Service.

Main Street Capital Access Act or the Main Street Act

This bill lessens and otherwise modifies banking regulations, including those regarding institution formation, supervision by federal financial regulators, and bank merger requirements. 

Under the bill, new banks have a three-year phase-in period to meet certain capital requirements. The bill also reduces the leverage ratio for certain rural community banks.

Financial regulators must (1) tailor regulatory actions to limit burdens on financial institutions and must consider the institutions' risk profiles and business models, and (2) review their regulations more frequently and expand the scope of these reviews. 

The bill eases requirements regarding bank mergers, for example, by allowing financial regulators to approve certain bank mergers without considering if the merger is noncompetitive or monopolistic.

The bill increases the dollar asset thresholds for various fees, reporting requirements, and other regulatory requirements so that more financial companies and banks are exempt from these requirements. For example, the bill increases the total asset threshold above which financial holding companies need Federal Reserve Board approval to acquire a company, thereby allowing for more acquisitions without board approval. The bill also raises certain asset thresholds so as to allow additional small bank holding companies to operate with higher debt levels and additional small banks to qualify for a longer examination cycle.

The bill also provides flexibilities regarding the use of reciprocal deposits, the resolution of failed banks, and other regulated activities.  

Text of the bill

Expand all

I New Bank Formation and Local Community Access

II Tailoring Bank Regulation

III Fair and Transparent Bank Supervision

Sec. 304. Financial Integrity and Regulation Management Changed · Jul 21

Where this section came from

  1. Jan 7, 2026 · Introduced in House Referred to House Committee on Financial Services, Jan 7
  2. Jul 21, 2026 · Engrossed in House H.Amdt. 241: Pursuant to the provisions of H. Res. 1438, in lieu of the amendment in the nature of a substitute recommended by the Committee on Financial Services now printed in the bill, an amendment in the nature of a substitute consisting of the text of Rules Committee Print 119-35 is considered as adopted. Official page › H.Res. 1438: On Ordering the Previous Question — Passed, 213–209 · Roll Call 253 H.Res. 1438: On Agreeing to the Resolution — Passed, 214–211 · Roll Call 254 On Motion to Recommit — Failed, 210–216 · Roll Call 270On Passage — Passed, 270–155 · Roll Call 271
What changed in the text

… 25 unchanged passages …

(c) Study on reputational risk. Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Federal banking agency shall— (1) carry out a study to evaluate the use of reputational risk in the supervision of depository institutions; and (2) determine whether the removal of reputational risk in the supervision of depository institutions would threaten the safety and soundness of those depository institutions. (d) Removal of reputational risk as a consideration in the supervision of depository institutions. Each If a Federal banking agency determines, under subsection (c), that the removal of reputational risk in the supervision of depository institutions would not threaten the safety and soundness of those depository institutions, the Federal banking agency shall remove from any guidance, rule, examination manual, or similar document established by the agency any reference to reputational risk, or any term substantially similar, regarding the supervision of depository institutions such that reputational risk, or any term substantially similar, is no longer taken into consideration by the Federal banking agency when examining and supervising a depository institution. ( d e ) Prohibition. No If a Federal banking agency may determines, engage under subsection (c), that the removal of reputational risk in any the activity supervision concerning of or depository related institutions to would not threaten the regulation safety and soundness of those depository institutions , the agency may not engage in rulemaking, the issuance of guidance, supervision activities , or examination enforcement of activities related to the reputational risk , or of any a term depository substantially institution similar, or the management managing thereof, of reputational risk by a depository institution, including— (1) establishing any rule, regulation, requirement, standard, or supervisory expectation concerning or related to the reputational risk , or of any a term depository substantially similar institution , or the management thereof, of a depository institution whether binding or not; (2) conducting any examination, assessment, data collection, or other supervisory exercise concerning or related to reputational risk , or of any a term depository substantially similar institution , or the management thereof , of a depository institution ; (3) issuing any examination finding, supervisory criticism, or other supervisory or examination communication concerning or related to reputational risk , or of any a term depository substantially similar institution , or the management thereof , of a depository institution ; (4) making any supervisory ratings decision or determination that is based, in whole or in part, on any matter concerning or related to reputational risk , or of any a term depository substantially similar institution , or the management thereof , of a depository institution ; and (5) taking any formal or informal enforcement action that is based, in whole or in part, on any matter concerning or related to reputational risk , or of any a term depository substantially similar institution , or the management thereof , of a depository institution . ( e f ) Reports. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, each Federal banking agency shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report that—

… 2 unchanged passages …

What does "considered adopted" mean?

When a chamber approves a rule that says a change is "considered adopted", the change becomes part of the bill as soon as the rule passes, without a separate vote on the change itself.

(a) Findings. Congress finds that—

(1) the primary objective of financial regulation and supervision by the Federal banking agencies is to promote safety and soundness of depository institutions;

(2) all federally legal businesses and law-abiding citizens regardless of political ideology should have equal opportunity to obtain financial services and should not face unlawful discrimination in obtaining such services;

(3) financial service providers are private entities entitled to provide services to whichever customers they so choose, provided that those decisions do not violate the law;

(4) financial service providers should strive to ensure that all business decisions are based on factors free from unlawful prejudice or political influence;

(5) the use of reputational risk in supervisory frameworks encourages Federal banking agencies to regulate depository institutions based on the subjective view of negative publicity and provides cover for the agencies to implement their own political agenda unrelated to the safety and soundness of a depository institution;

(6) Federal banking agencies have in fact used reputational risk to limit access of federally legal businesses and law-abiding citizens to financial services in 2018 when the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation acknowledged that the agency used reputational risk reviews to limit access to financial services by certain industries, commonly known as Operation Choke Point; and

(7) reputational risk does not appear in any statute and is an unnecessary and improper use of supervisory authority that does not contribute to the safety and soundness of the financial system.

(b) Definitions. In this section:

(1) Depository institution. The term depository institution—

(A) has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813);

(B) includes a depository institution holding company, as such term is defined in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813); and

(C) includes an insured credit union, as such term is defined in section 101 of the Federal Credit Union Act (12 U.S.C. 1752).

(2) Federal banking agency. The term Federal banking agency—

(A) has the meaning given the term in section 3 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1813); and

(B) includes—

(i) the National Credit Union Administration; and

(ii) the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection.

(3) Foreign terrorist organization. The term foreign terrorist organization means a foreign organization that is designated by the Secretary of State in accordance with section 219 of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. 1189).

(4) Reputational risk. The term reputational risk means the potential that negative publicity or negative public opinion regarding a depository institution’s business practices, whether true or not, will cause a decline in confidence in the institution or a decline in the customer base, costly litigation, or revenue reductions or otherwise adversely impact the depository institution. The previous sentence does not apply to negative publicity or negative public opinion regarding an institution’s business practices where such practices involve unlawful transactions in connection with state sponsors of terrorism or foreign terrorist organizations.

(5) State sponsors of terrorism. The term state sponsors of terrorism means a country, the government of which has been determined by the Secretary of State to have repeatedly provided support for acts of international terrorism, for purposes of—

(A) section 1754(c)(1)(A)(i) of the Export Control Reform Act of 2018 (50 U.S.C. 4813(c)(1)(A)(i));

(B) section 620A of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C. 2371);

(C) section 40(d) of the Arms Export Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)); or

(D) any other provision of law.

(c) Study on reputational risk. Not later than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act, each Federal banking agency shall—

(1) carry out a study to evaluate the use of reputational risk in the supervision of depository institutions; and

(2) determine whether the removal of reputational risk in the supervision of depository institutions would threaten the safety and soundness of those depository institutions.

(d) Removal of reputational risk as a consideration in the supervision of depository institutions. If a Federal banking agency determines, under subsection (c), that the removal of reputational risk in the supervision of depository institutions would not threaten the safety and soundness of those depository institutions, the Federal banking agency shall remove from any guidance, rule, examination manual, or similar document established by the agency any reference to reputational risk, or any term substantially similar, regarding the supervision of depository institutions such that reputational risk, or any term substantially similar, is no longer taken into consideration by the Federal banking agency when examining and supervising a depository institution.

(e) Prohibition. If a Federal banking agency determines, under subsection (c), that the removal of reputational risk in the supervision of depository institutions would not threaten the safety and soundness of those depository institutions, the agency may not engage in rulemaking, the issuance of guidance, supervision activities, or enforcement activities related to the reputational risk of a depository institution or the managing of reputational risk by a depository institution, including—

(1) establishing any rule, regulation, requirement, standard, or supervisory expectation concerning or related to the reputational risk of a depository institution, or the management thereof, whether binding or not;

(2) conducting any examination, assessment, data collection, or other supervisory exercise concerning or related to reputational risk of a depository institution, or the management thereof;

(3) issuing any examination finding, supervisory criticism, or other supervisory or examination communication concerning or related to reputational risk of a depository institution, or the management thereof;

(4) making any supervisory ratings decision or determination that is based, in whole or in part, on any matter concerning or related to reputational risk of a depository institution, or the management thereof; and

(5) taking any formal or informal enforcement action that is based, in whole or in part, on any matter concerning or related to reputational risk of a depository institution, or the management thereof.

(f) Reports. Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, each Federal banking agency shall submit to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives a report that—

(1) confirms implementation of this section; and

(2) describes any changes made to internal policies as a result of this section.

IV Regulatory Accountability and Transparency

V Strengthening Local Bank Funding

VI Promoting Bank Competition and Merger Clarity

VII Strengthening Transparency and Involvement in Bank Resolutions

VIII Facilitating Innovation and Bank Partnerships