H.R. 5361
George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2025
Sponsor: Glenn Ivey
136 cosponsors
- John B. Larson
- Donald Norcross
- Debbie Dingell
- Nanette Diaz Barragán
- Suzanne Bonamici
- Everton Blair Jr.
- Adam Smith
- Adriano Espaillat
- Al Green
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez
- Alma S. Adams
- Ami Bera
- André Carson
- Ayanna Pressley
- Becca Balint
- Bennie G. Thompson
- Betty McCollum
- Bill Foster
- Bonnie Watson Coleman
- Brad Sherman
- Bradley Scott Schneider
- Chellie Pingree
- Chrissy Houlahan
- Christopher R. Deluzio
- Danny K. Davis
- Darren Soto
- David Scott
- Debbie Wasserman Schultz
- Deborah K. Ross
- Delia C. Ramirez
- Diana DeGette
- Donald S. Beyer, Jr.
- Doris O. Matsui
- Dwight Evans
- Eleanor Holmes Norton
- Emanuel Cleaver
- Emily Randall
- Eric Swalwell
- Frank J. Mrvan
- Frederica S. Wilson
- Grace Meng
- Gregory W. Meeks
- Gwen Moore
- Haley M. Stevens
- Henry C. "Hank" Johnson, Jr.
- Ilhan Omar
- J. Luis Correa
- Jahana Hayes
- James E. Clyburn
- James P. McGovern
- Jamie Raskin
- Janice D. Schakowsky
- Jared Huffman
- Jasmine Crockett
- Jason Crow
- Jennifer L. McClellan
- Jerrold Nadler
- Jesús G. "Chuy" García
- Jill N. Tokuda
- Jim Costa
- Jimmy Panetta
- Joe Neguse
- John Garamendi
- Johnny Olszewski, Jr.
- Jonathan L. Jackson
- Joseph D. Morelle
- Joyce Beatty
- Juan Vargas
- Judy Chu
- Julia Brownley
- Julie Johnson
- Kathy Castor
- Kweisi Mfume
- LaMonica McIver
- Lateefah Simon
- Laura Friedman
- Lauren Underwood
- Lizzie Fletcher
- Lloyd Doggett
- Lori Trahan
- Lucy McBath
- Madeleine Dean
- Marc A. Veasey
- Marilyn Strickland
- Mark DeSaulnier
- Mark Pocan
- Mary Gay Scanlon
- Maxine Waters
- Maxwell Frost
- Melanie A. Stansbury
- Morgan McGarvey
- Nancy Pelosi
- Nikema Williams
- Nydia M. Velázquez
- Paul Tonko
- Pramila Jayapal
- Raja Krishnamoorthi
- Rashida Tlaib
- Rick Larsen
- Ritchie Torres
- Ro Khanna
- Robert Garcia
- Robin L. Kelly
- Sara Jacobs
- Sarah McBride
- Scott H. Peters
- Sean Casten
- Seth Moulton
- Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick
- Shomari Figures
- Shontel M. Brown
- Shri Thanedar
- Stacey E. Plaskett
- Steny H. Hoyer
- Stephen F. Lynch
- Steve Cohen
- Suzan K. DelBene
- Sydney Kamlager-Dove
- Sylvia R. Garcia
- Ted Lieu
- Teresa Leger Fernandez
- Terri A. Sewell
- Troy A. Carter
- Valerie P. Foushee
- Veronica Escobar
- Wesley Bell
- Yassamin Ansari
- Yvette D. Clarke
- Luz M. Rivas
- Greg Casar
- Sanford D. Bishop, Jr.
- Kevin Mullin
- Christian D. Menefee
- James R. Walkinshaw
- Sarah Elfreth
- Jimmy Gomez
Official summary
Written by the Congressional Research Service.
George Floyd Justice in Policing Act of 2025
This bill addresses a wide range of policies and issues regarding policing practices and law enforcement accountability. It increases accountability for law enforcement misconduct, restricts the use of certain policing practices, enhances transparency and data collection, and establishes best practices and training requirements.
The bill enhances existing enforcement mechanisms to remedy violations by law enforcement. Among other things, it does the following:
- lowers the criminal intent standard—from willful to knowing or reckless—to convict a law enforcement officer for misconduct in a federal prosecution,
- limits qualified immunity as a defense to liability in a private civil action against a law enforcement officer, and
- grants administrative subpoena power to the Department of Justice (DOJ) in pattern-or-practice investigations.
It establishes a framework to prevent and remedy racial profiling by law enforcement at the federal, state, and local levels. It also limits the unnecessary use of force and restricts the use of no-knock warrants, chokeholds, and carotid holds.
The bill creates a national registry—the National Police Misconduct Registry—to compile data on complaints and records of police misconduct. It also establishes new reporting requirements, including on the use of force, officer misconduct, and routine policing practices (e.g., stops and searches).
Finally, it directs DOJ to create uniform accreditation standards for law enforcement agencies and requires law enforcement officers to complete training on racial profiling, implicit bias, and the duty to intervene when another officer uses excessive force.
Text of the bill
I Police Accountability
A Holding Police Accountable in the Courts
B Law Enforcement Trust and Integrity Act
II Policing Transparency Through Data
A National Police Misconduct Registry
B PRIDE Act
III Improving Police Training and Policies
A End Racial and Religious Profiling Act
In this subtitle:
(1) Covered program. The term covered program means any program or activity funded in whole or in part with funds made available under—
(A) a Byrne grant program; and
(B) the COPS grant program, except that no program, project, or other activity specified in section 1701(b)(13) of part Q of title I of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (34 U.S.C. 10381 et seq.) shall be a covered program under this paragraph.
(2) Governmental body. The term governmental body means any department, agency, special purpose district, or other instrumentality of Federal, State, local, or Indian Tribal government.
(3) Hit rate. The term hit rate means the percentage of stops and searches in which a law enforcement agent finds drugs, a gun, or something else that leads to an arrest. The hit rate is calculated by dividing the total number of searches by the number of searches that yield contraband. The hit rate is complementary to the rate of false stops.
(4) Law enforcement agency. The term law enforcement agency means any Federal, State, or local public agency engaged in the prevention, detection, or investigation of violations of criminal, immigration, or customs laws.
(5) Law enforcement agent. The term law enforcement agent means any Federal, State, or local official responsible for enforcing criminal, immigration, or customs laws, including police officers and other agents of a law enforcement agency.
(6) Racial profiling
(A) In general. The term racial profiling means the practice of a law enforcement agent or agency relying, to any degree, on actual or perceived race, ethnicity, national origin, religion, gender, gender identity, or sexual orientation in selecting which individual to subject to routine or spontaneous investigatory activities or in deciding upon the scope and substance of law enforcement activity following the initial investigatory procedure, except when there is trustworthy information, relevant to the locality and timeframe, that links a person with a particular characteristic described in this paragraph to an identified criminal incident or scheme.
(B) Exception. For purposes of subparagraph (A), a tribal law enforcement officer exercising law enforcement authority within Indian country, as that term is defined in section 1151 of title 18, United States Code, is not considered to be racial profiling with respect to making key jurisdictional determinations that are necessarily tied to reliance on actual or perceived race, ethnicity, or tribal affiliation.
(7) Routine or spontaneous investigatory activities. The term routine or spontaneous investigatory activities means the following activities by a law enforcement agent:
(A) Interviews.
(B) Traffic stops.
(C) Pedestrian stops.
(D) Frisks and other types of body searches.
(E) Consensual or nonconsensual searches of the persons, property, or possessions (including vehicles) of individuals using any form of public or private transportation, including motorists and pedestrians.
(F) Data collection and analysis, assessments, and predicated investigations.
(G) Inspections and interviews of entrants into the United States that are more extensive than those customarily carried out.
(H) Immigration-related workplace investigations.
(I) Such other types of law enforcement encounters compiled for or by the Federal Bureau of Investigation or the Department of Justice Bureau of Justice Statistics.
(8) Reasonable request. The term reasonable request means all requests for information, except for those that—
(A) are immaterial to the investigation;
(B) would result in the unnecessary disclosure of personal information; or
(C) would place a severe burden on the resources of the law enforcement agency given its size.
I Prohibition of Racial Profiling
II Programs To Eliminate Racial Profiling By Federal Law Enforcement Agencies
III Programs To Eliminate Racial Profiling By State and Local Law Enforcement Agencies
IV Data Collection
V Department of Justice Regulations and Reports on Racial Profiling in the United States
B Additional Reforms
C Law Enforcement Body Cameras
1 Federal Police Camera and Accountability Act
2 Police CAMERA Act
IV Closing the Law Enforcement Consent Loophole
V Miscellaneous Provisions