H.R. 3633
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act
Sponsor: J. French Hill
21 cosponsors
- Josh Gottheimer
- Bill Huizenga
- Daniel Meuser
- Earl L. "Buddy" Carter
- Kristen McDonald Rivet
- Mark B. Messmer
- Michael Lawler
- Nicholas J. Begich III
- Riley M. Moore
- Robert P. Bresnahan, Jr.
- Shri Thanedar
- Zachary Nunn
- Haley M. Stevens
- Angie Craig
- Bryan Steil
- Donald G. Davis
- Dusty Johnson
- Glenn Thompson
- Ritchie Torres
- Tom Emmer
- Warren Davidson
Official summary
Written by the Congressional Research Service.
Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025 or the CLARITY Act of 2025
This bill establishes a regulatory framework for digital commodities, defined by the bill as digital assets that rely upon a blockchain for their value.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission must generally regulate digital commodities transactions, including digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers. To qualify for trade on an exchange (1) a digital commodity’s blockchain must be mature, or on a blockchain system that has achieved decentralized control as defined by the bill; or (2) the issuer of the digital commodity must file certain reports. The bill establishes requirements for trade monitoring, recordkeeping, and the commingling of customer assets.
The bill exempts digital commodities on mature blockchains (and digital commodities on blockchains expected to mature within certain timeframes) from Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) registration requirements if annual sales fall under a certain amount and other requirements are met. The bill provides the SEC with jurisdiction over digital commodity activities and transactions engaged in by certain brokers and dealers on alternative trading systems and by national securities exchanges.
Digital commodity exchanges, brokers, and dealers are subject to the Bank Secrecy Act for anti-money laundering and related purposes.
The bill also sets forth requirements for alternative trading systems, previously issued digital commodities, and provisional registration until the bill is implemented.
For more information on this bill, see CRS Insight IN12583, Crypto Legislation: An Overview of H.R. 3633, the CLARITY Act.
Text of the bill
I Definitions; Rulemaking; Expedited Registration
II Offers and Sales of Digital Commodities
III Registration for Intermediaries at the Securities and Exchange Commission
IV Registration for Digital Commodity Intermediaries at the Commodity Futures Trading Commission
V Innovation and Technology Improvements
VI Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act
I Responsible securities innovation
Where this section came from
Not in the first version (Introduced in House, May 29).
-
Jun 1, 2026 · Reported to Senate Marked up by Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, May 14 Reported by Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, Jun 1 Committee members' individual votes aren't in our records.
What is a markup?
A markup is a committee meeting where members go through a bill and vote on changes before sending it to the full chamber.
(a) In general. Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall adopt rules that provide that—
(1) a network token shall not be considered as providing a disqualifying financial right under section 4B(a)(7)(B) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, if the market value of the network token is primarily derived, or is reasonably expected to be primarily derived, from a distributed ledger system or from the broader adoption and use of such a system, including where—
(A) the mechanisms of the distributed ledger system collect, receive, accrue, or distribute consideration from the functioning of the distributed ledger system;
(B) the network token provides governance capabilities with respect to a distributed ledger system or a decentralized governance system;
(C) the value of the network token appreciates or depreciates due to the use of, or in response to the efforts, operations, or financial performance of, the distributed ledger system to which the network token relates or its decentralized governance system; or
(D) for a network token that meets the definition of an ancillary asset, the value of the network token appreciates or depreciates due to the efforts of the ancillary asset originator or related person; and
(2) participants in offers or sales of network tokens providing financial interests described in paragraph (1) shall not be precluded from relying on the exemption from registration under section 4B(b) of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act.
(b) Effect of rulings and actions before date of enactment
(1) In general. If, before the date of enactment of this Act, a court of the United States, in a non-appealable final judgment, found that a digital asset transaction was not an offer, sale, or distribution of a security, a digital asset transferred pursuant to that offer, sale, or distribution shall not be considered to be a security under any provision of law described in subsection (b)(2) of section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act.
(2) Network tokens. A network token shall not be considered to be an ancillary asset, and shall not be considered to be a security under any provision of law described in subsection (b)(2) of section 4B of the Securities Act of 1933, as added by this Act, if, on January 1, 2026, any units of that network token were the principal asset of an exchange-traded product—
(A) not registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (15 U.S.C. 80a–1 et seq.); and
(B) the shares of which are listed and traded on a national securities exchange registered under section 6 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. 78f).
II Protecting against illicit finance
III Responsible innovation in decentralized finance
IV Responsible banking innovation
V Responsible regulatory innovation
VI Protecting software developers and software innovation
VII Protecting customer property
VIII Customer protection
IX Other matters