H.R. 1897
ESA Amendments Act of 2025
Sponsor: Bruce Westerman
26 cosponsors
- Michael A. Rulli
- Andy Biggs
- Celeste Maloy
- Cliff Bentz
- Dan Newhouse
- Doug LaMalfa
- Harriet M. Hageman
- Jeff Hurd
- Mark E. Amodei
- Mike Ezell
- Nicholas J. Begich III
- Paul A. Gosar
- Pete Stauber
- Russ Fulcher
- Thomas P. Tiffany
- Wesley Hunt
- Troy Downing
- Addison P. McDowell
- Lauren Boebert
- Glenn Thompson
- Ken Calvert
- Mike Collins
- Clay Higgins
- Tim Walberg
- Glenn Grothman
- Robert E. Latta
Official summary
Written by the Congressional Research Service.
ESA Amendments Act of 2025
This bill reauthorizes through FY2031 the Endangered Species Act and generally narrows protections provided under the act.
The bill directs the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service to submit a National Listing Work Plan that establishes a five-year schedule and plan for addressing listing of endangered or threatened species and designation of critical habitats for such species. Under the plan, the bill gives the Services flexibility on the timing of acting on listing petitions and eliminates the requirement for the Services to act within 12 months on listing petitions.
The bill limits what land may be designated as critical habitat for an endangered or threatened species.
It also limits protections provided to threatened species and allows a state to regulate the recovery of such species if the Services determine the state's proposed recovery strategy would conserve the species.
The bill provides statutory authority for Conservation Benefit Agreements, which allow private landowners to voluntarily enter agreements to reduce threats to candidate species in exchange for being allowed to continue their operations if the species is later listed.
The bill also modifies the permitting process for certain other voluntary conservation agreements, including by exempting incidental take permits (e.g., permits to harm or kill a species) from environmental review requirements.
The bill also makes a variety of other changes to the act, including limiting consultation requirements, judicial review, and awards for attorneys’ fees in certain cases.
Text of the bill
I Optimizing conservation through resource prioritization
Where this section came from
-
Mar 6, 2025 · Introduced in House Referred to House Committee on Natural Resources, Mar 6
-
Mar 24, 2026 · Reported in House Marked up by House Committee on Natural Resources, Dec 17 Reported by House Committee on Natural Resources, Mar 24 Committee members' individual votes aren't in our records.
… 4 unchanged passages …
(A) findings as described in subsection (b)(3)(B
); (B
)
for
any
each
proposed
such
or
covered
final
species;
determination under subsection
(
B
a)(1
)
proposed
required
and
by
final
a
determinations
court
regarding
order,
listing
court
each
decree,
such
or
covered
court-approved
species
settlement
under this section
agreement
; and (C)
any
proposed
and
or
final
designation of
critical habitat
designations
under subsection (a)(3)
relating
required
to
by
each
a
such
court
covered
order,
species
court decree, or court-approved settlement agreement
.
… 4 unchanged passages …
(B) Additional inclusions. The Secretary shall include with each budget request referred to in subparagraph (A) a description of the amounts to be requested to carry out the work plan for the fiscal year covered by the budget request, including any amounts requested to address
emergency
potential future
listings
if
of
the
species
Secretary
considered
identifies
on
any
an
emergency
posing
basis
a
in
significant
that
risk
fiscal
to the well-being of any species of fish or wildlife or plant
year
.
… 7 unchanged passages …
(iv) Priority 4 represents species for which proactive conservation efforts likely to reduce
threats
the
to
effects of
the
factors described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of subsection (a)(1) on the
species are being developed or carried out, within a reasonable timeframe and in an organized manner, by Federal agencies, States, landowners, or other stakeholders.
… 2 unchanged passages …
(aa)
threats
the effects of the factors described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of subsection (a)(1) on
to the species; or
… 2 unchanged passages …
(B) Use of methodology. The Secretary shall establish and assign priority classifications under subparagraph (A) in accordance with the notice of the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service titled Methodology for Prioritizing Status Reviews and Accompanying 12
-
–
Month Findings on Petitions for Listing Under the Endangered Species Act (81 Fed. Reg. 49248; published July 27, 2016
).
), or any successor document.
… 4 unchanged passages …
(D) Revision of priority classification. The Secretary may revise, in accordance with subparagraph (A), the assignment to a priority classification of a species included in a work plan at any time
during the fiscal years to which the work plan applies
.
… 10 unchanged passages …
(b) Conforming
amendments
amendment
. Section 4(b)(3
)(B
) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3
)(B
)) is amended
— (1) in subparagraph (B),
by striking Within 12 months and inserting In accordance with the national listing work plan submitted under subsection (j
),; and (2) in subparagraph (C), to read as follows: [Inserted into the law: (C) Any negative finding described in subparagraph (A) and any finding described in subparagraph (B)(i)(I) shall be subject to judicial review. ]
),.
What is a markup?
A markup is a committee meeting where members go through a bill and vote on changes before sending it to the full chamber.
(a) In general. Section 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533) is amended by adding at the end the following:
(j) National listing work plan
(1) In general. Not later than the date described in paragraph (2), the Secretary shall submit to Congress a national listing work plan that establishes, for each covered species, a schedule for the completion during the 5-fiscal year period beginning on October 1 of the first fiscal year after the date of the submission of the work plan of—
(A) findings as described in subsection (b)(3)(B);
(B) any proposed or final determination under subsection (a)(1) required by a court order, court decree, or court-approved settlement agreement; and
(C) any proposed or final designation of critical habitat under subsection (a)(3) required by a court order, court decree, or court-approved settlement agreement.
(2) Submission to Congress
(A) In general. The Secretary shall submit to Congress—
(i) together with the budget request of the Secretary for the first fiscal year that begins not less than 365 days after the date of the enactment of this subsection, the initial work plan required under paragraph (1); and
(ii) together with the budget request of the Secretary for each fiscal year thereafter, an updated work plan under paragraph (1).
(B) Additional inclusions. The Secretary shall include with each budget request referred to in subparagraph (A) a description of the amounts to be requested to carry out the work plan for the fiscal year covered by the budget request, including any amounts requested to address potential future listings of species considered on an emergency basis in that fiscal year.
(3) Priority
(A) In general. In developing a work plan under this subsection, the Secretary shall assign to each species included in the work plan a priority classification of Priority 1 through Priority 5, such that, as determined by the Secretary, the following apply:
(i) Priority 1 represents species of the highest priority, to be designated as critically imperiled and in need of immediate action.
(ii) Priority 2 represents species with respect to which the best scientific and commercial data available support a clear decision regarding the status of the species.
(iii) Priority 3 represents species with respect to which studies regarding the status of the species are being carried out—
(I) to answer key questions that may influence the findings of a petition to list the species submitted under subsection (b)(3); and
(II) to resolve any uncertainty regarding the status of the species within a reasonable timeframe.
(iv) Priority 4 represents species for which proactive conservation efforts likely to reduce the effects of the factors described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of subsection (a)(1) on the species are being developed or carried out, within a reasonable timeframe and in an organized manner, by Federal agencies, States, landowners, or other stakeholders.
(v) Priority 5 represents species—
(I) for which there exists little information regarding—
(aa) the effects of the factors described in subparagraphs (A) through (E) of subsection (a)(1) on to the species; or
(bb) the status of the species; or
(II) that would receive limited conservation benefit in the foreseeable future by listing the species as a threatened species or endangered species under this section.
(B) Use of methodology. The Secretary shall establish and assign priority classifications under subparagraph (A) in accordance with the notice of the Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service titled Methodology for Prioritizing Status Reviews and Accompanying 12–Month Findings on Petitions for Listing Under the Endangered Species Act (81 Fed. Reg. 49248; published July 27, 2016), or any successor document.
(C) Extensions for certain priority classifications
(i) Priority 3. With respect to a species classified as Priority 3 under subparagraph (A)(iii), if the Secretary determines that additional time would allow for more complete data collection or the completion of studies relating to the species, the Secretary may retain the species under the work plan for a period of not more than 5 years after the deadline under paragraph (4).
(ii) Priority 4. With respect to a species classified as Priority 4 under subparagraph (A)(iv), if the Secretary determines that existing conservation efforts continue to meet the conservation needs of the species, the Secretary may retain the species under the work plan for a period of not more than 5 years after the deadline under paragraph (4).
(iii) Priority 5. With respect to a species classified as Priority 5 under subparagraph (A)(v), the Secretary may retain the species under the work plan for a period of not more than 5 years after the deadline under paragraph (4).
(D) Revision of priority classification. The Secretary may revise, in accordance with subparagraph (A), the assignment to a priority classification of a species included in a work plan at any time.
(E) Effect of priority classification. The assignment of a priority classification to a species included in a work plan is not a final agency action.
(4) Deadline. The Secretary shall act on any petition to add a species to a list published under subsection (c) submitted under subsection (b)(3) not later than the last day of the fiscal year specified for that petition in the most recent work plan.
(5) Regulations. The Secretary may issue such regulations as the Secretary determines appropriate to carry out this subsection.
(6) Effect of subsection. Nothing in this subsection may be construed to preclude or otherwise affect the emergency listing authority of the Secretary under subsection (b)(7).
(7) Definitions. In this subsection:
(A) Covered species. The term covered species means a species that is not included on a list published under subsection (c)—
(i) for which a petition to add the species to such a list has been submitted under subsection (b)(3); or
(ii) that is otherwise under consideration by the Secretary for addition to such a list.
(B) Work plan. The term work plan means the national listing work plan submitted by the Secretary under paragraph (1).
(b) Conforming amendment. Section 4(b)(3)(B) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1533(b)(3)(B)) is amended by striking Within 12 months and inserting In accordance with the national listing work plan submitted under subsection (j),.
II Incentivizing wildlife conservation on private lands
III Providing for greater incentives to recover listed species
IV Creating greater transparency and accountability in recovering listed species
V Streamlining permitting process
VI Eliminating barriers to conservation
VII Restoring congressional intent