H.R. 10184
Consumer Financial Protection Accountability and Reform Act of 2026
Sponsor: Andy Barr
30 cosponsors
- Ken Calvert
- Andrew Ogles
- Andrew R. Garbarino
- Ann Wagner
- Barry Loudermilk
- Bill Huizenga
- Bryan Steil
- Byron Donalds
- Daniel Meuser
- Frank D. Lucas
- J. French Hill
- John W. Rose
- Lisa C. McClain
- Maria Elvira Salazar
- Marlin A. Stutzman
- Michael Lawler
- Mike Flood
- Mike Haridopolos
- Monica De La Cruz
- Pete Sessions
- Ralph Norman
- Roger Williams
- Scott Fitzgerald
- Tim Moore
- Tom Emmer
- Troy Downing
- Warren Davidson
- William R. Timmons IV
- Young Kim
- Zachary Nunn
Official summary
No official summary yet.
Text of the bill
I Reforming Bureau Governance
(a) Rulemaking under Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. Section 1022(b)(2)(A) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (12 U.S.C. 5512(b)(2)(A)) is amended—
(1) in clause (i), by striking and at the end;
(2) in clause (ii), by striking the semicolon at the end and inserting ; and; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
(iii) the impact of proposed rules on small entities, in accordance with section 609 of title 5, United States Code;
(b) Initial regulatory flexibility analysis. Section 603(d)(1) of title 5, United States Code, is amended—
(1) in subparagraph (B), by striking and at the end;
(2) in subparagraph (C), by striking the period and inserting ; and; and
(3) by adding at the end the following:
(D) where the covered agency does not adopt any alternatives described in paragraphs (1) through (4) of subsection (c), a detailed justification of the covered agency’s determination that the relative size and resources of small entities should have no bearing on the rule, supported by factual, policy and legal reasons.
(c) Final regulatory flexibility analysis. Section 604(a) of title 5, United States Code, is amended by amending the second paragraph (6) to read as follows:
(7) for a covered agency, as defined in section 609(d)(2), a description of the steps the agency has taken to minimize any additional cost of credit for small entities and, where no significant alternatives for small entities was adopted, a detailed justification of the covered agency’s determination that the relative size and resources of small entities should have no bearing on the rule, supported by factual, policy and legal reasons.
II Restoring Legal Clarity and Procedural Fairness
III Promoting Innovation in Consumer Financial Markets
IV Promoting Effective, Predictable Supervision
V Preventing Regulation by Enforcement